Labour peer Baroness Uddin will not face charges over her expenses, the Crown Prosecution Service has said.
She had been accused of designating a rarely-used flat in Kent as her main home so she could claim allowances for peers living outside London.
She was one of the most obvious troughers, and yet the most arrogant with the strongest ideas of entitlement.
Police had obtained evidence from neighbours of Baroness Uddin and from water, gas and electric companies supplying the flat in Maidstone.
So pretty conclusive then? Especially the utility company's information?
Apparently not...
But Director of Public Prosecutions Mr Starmer said the definition of a peer's "main home" in the Lords expenses scheme would always have been "critical to any possible criminal proceedings against Baroness Uddin".
But he said "only or main residence" had not been defined and last November the Clerk of Parliaments Michael Pownall said that ultimately "it is up to members to designate an address as their main residence as they see fit".
He had set a threshold that peers must visit their "main home" at least once a month.
Absolutely unbeliveable. There are no words.
Except....
FUCK YOU, UDDIN, YOU GRASPING CUNT. GIVE US OUR FUCKING MONEY BACK.
Update: CF points out that no less than three of the people on the Spitalsfield Housing Association (who provide this dirt-cheap accommodation to the needy) Board of Management also have the surname Uddin. Quelle surprise.
2 comments:
Well, we don't want to upset the muzzies do we? Even if they have been thieving.
Indeed. It was mostly Asians behind the postal vote fraud that undoubtably helped Labour win the last election, but we can't mention that either.
Post a Comment