I've been contacted by someone who is trying to get a perfectly reasonable comment past the moderators on The Register for
this article which almost reads like an advert for Bristol City Council's IT department. The fact they're not letting this comment through speaks volumes.
So what is this information?
Well, it concerns this:
The council has been seen as something of a poster child for open source public sector contracts in the past. In November 2004 it declared plans to shift 5,000 workers off proprietary desktop software over to Sun Microsystem’s StarOffice 7, in a move it said at the time would save £1.4m by 2009
I'm told this is
not how it went down. Apparently, there were a number of terrible decisions made with this roll-out, chief of which was to not set the default file type that it opened/saved to Microsoft Office, instead keeping it at OpenDocument Format. Apparently this was done because it's the "European Standard" (never mind that it's
not any kind of standard, given that nearly all companies use MS Office), but this decision, combined with poor communication and training of staff resulted in many,many staff thinking that they wouldn't be able to open and save the MS Office documents they and external companies used, so they applied for an "Exception", ensuring they could still use Office.
So what's the outcome of this?
At the end of the StarOffice roll-out, there were more individual MS Office licenses purchased and in use than before.So instead of saving £1.4m they actually
lost money.
Nice to see they're so honest about it.